The issue of compatibility has nothing to do with quality or the character of a company. It also implies that the quality of the product is deficient when, without a tester, the only way to determine quality is to test physical parameters with very expensive test equipment. The "easier way" you describe means insulting a company when one of its products may not work with a drive that does not recognize it.
INSTALL MEMOREX DVD WRITER CODE
It is a possibility that could be investigated, but introducing that MID code as a cause is invalid.
Until the user mentions it, it has no place in the logic of troubleshooting. Yes, I consider that an attack, however indirect it may have been.ĬMC does make a lot of Memorex product.
INSTALL MEMOREX DVD WRITER SERIES
The "proof" was a link to an old series of attacks on that same brand from a time when everyone was afraid to point out that such attacks were filled with misinformation. A post informed him that the brand he was using was no good, despite what he was seeing. The user found a solution to his problem. Although this information is both valid and valuable, it is neither fact nor proven information. People's claims are are anecdotal information. No one has mentioned them either, despite the fact that CMC has gone through more than their share of those types of problems. There are, however, identifiable physical defects that cause problems. That's not hard to understand since test equipment is beyond the means of consumers. "Fact and proven information." I have yet to see a specification. It forms the scientific method of discovering the truth. Logic is the method of troubleshooting, of identifying a problem and resolving it. "No one is talking about logic here." How sadly true. Of course the disc failed later-the original errors were too high in the first place, and time only makes them worse. This is exactly my point, but I come to different conclusions. Funny how you recommend Ritek and then show a RicohJPN (made by Ritek) scan on an incompatible firmware as "proof" another brand is no good. A logical defense does not imply support, but that may be too fine a distinction for mob mentality.īlivenet-interesting scan.
Not once have I ever recommended any brands other than two. It is only when I defend CMC or Memorex that the wolves howl. Does that make me a lover of those brands? No. It's so much easier to blame the disc.Ĩ) If I question the conclusions drawn by some and object to the unjustified attacks by others, how does that mean I favor particular brands? In this forum I have defended Taiyo Yuden, Verbatim, TDK, and Ritek from criticism that was not supported by the symptoms being described. That subsequent failure may also be do to a poor recording associated with mismatched firmware settings, but that is two steps to think about. It may work after a recording, but it will fail later. Memorex sometimes uses Ritek, Prodisc, MBI, and Taiyo Yuden, but the knee-jerk reaction is to condemn Memorex, CMC, TDK, Imation, HP, and others at the mere mention of their names.ħ) "Memorex sucks." This is the technical explanation proferred the by "experts" here. CMC? How did CMC come up? There is no mention of CMC. Where is the logic?ĥ) I wrote stating that an attack was unjustified and unwarranted.Ħ) I, in turn, am attacked for defending Memorex and CMC.
The experience of others is based on different conditions. Check out this old information." The implication is that if you do not have trouble now, you will later. Reread what was written and think about your knee-jerk reactions-ġ) A writer had a problem with a drive and with some discs.Ģ) The symptoms pointed to a firmware problem.ģ) The writer updated his firmware, and the discs work.Ĥ) Another writer said, "So what.
0 kommentar(er)
